Saturday, June 28, 2008

The Chi Swing


I started using this Chi swing machine today in hopes that it helps my lymphedema. I researched several and settled on this Sunpentown model. Others cost way more than I wanted to spend, $150 - $500. This was around $80. I'm a little leery, especially because I haven't read anything that says that it will help lower-extremity lymphedema, which is why I bought it, but what little research I've done suggests that it gets the legs moving at a decent enough pace that I think it should help the lymph nodes drain. So I'm hopeful.

The machine is more robust than what I thought it would be. It's actually pretty heavy duty, and the motor is powerful. The plastic grooves hurt my ankles, so I put a folded towel on that part of the machine, and that helped. The remote is handy; it has settings for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes. And it has a speed control where you can increase or decrease the pace incrementally. There's also an "auto" button that alternates between about 10 seconds of a slower swing and 10 seconds of a faster pace.

The swinging itself was more rapid than I expected, even at the lowest speed, but it was easy to get used to. I set the timer for five minutes, and it went quickly. The machine suddenly stopped and turned itself off. Just to make sure I didn't break it, I hit the on-off button on the remote, and the machine started swinging again.

After the session I felt more relaxed than I had going into it, although not whole lot. I expect that as I get used to it and increase the time, I will feel a stronger effect. I'm not into the whole chi thing, but I believe in the relaxation that movement brings. So even if this machine doesn't help my lymphedema, it should be a low-impact relaxation aid.

Sunpentown AB-07 Swing Machine- Balance CHI, Release Built-Up Tension and Get a Full Body Workout!

Monday, June 23, 2008

TwitThis vs. Twitious

One thing that is missing in Twhirl is the ability to quickly and efficiently post pages that you're reading. Two apps that offer this type of seamless, one-button publishing, TwitThis and Twitious, work like they should when they work. But when they don't, they're frustrating as all get out. It must be difficult to develop third-party applications for Twitter. I had been using TwitThis for about a week, and I had no problems with it. I'd be reading a page that I thought may be interesting to the Twitter community, and I'd click on my TwitThis bookmark. A popup would appear, I'd hit ok, and boom!, the page's url was converted to tiny url and it was automatically posted in my Twitter stream.

A couple of days ago, though, TwitThis wouldn't let me log in -- the login is the same as your Twitter login -- and it was giving me some sort of error. After a few tries, I did a search for another app, and I came across Twitious. What do you know, Twitious worked just like Twitter, only Twitious was working, so that's what I started using. Today, however, Twitious will not let me log in, so I tried TwitThis again, and guess what? It worked. So now I have both of them bookmarked. I guess I'll leave it that way so if one isn't working, the other will.

Indiana Historical Bureau Hosts Authors

I wish I could attend this reception. From the IHB press release:

The Indiana Historical Bureau Book Shop is hosting two well-known Hoosier authors-Julie Young and Andrew Stoner-from 11 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on Saturday, June 28, in the Indiana State Library and Historical Building at 315 West Ohio Street in downtown Indianapolis. Recently released books by Young and Stoner will be sold at 20 percent off list price. Parking will be available at the Senate Avenue Parking Facility for a flat fee of $3.00; enter off of New York Street (one way eastbound) just east of West Street. Street parking will also be available.

Visit the Historical Bureau website at www.IN.gov/history or call 317-232-2535 to place pre-orders. There will be limited book quantities at the reception.

Young will be on hand to sign her recently released book, _Historic Irvington_ (list price $19.99, paper). Young covers many of Irvington's local events for the _Indianapolis Star_. She is author of _A Belief in Providence: A Life of Saint Theodora Guerin_ and also writes for a number of local, regional, and national publications, including _Indianapolis Monthly_ magazine, AAA's _Home & Away_, and CNN.com. She has written for the Associated Press, has appeared on _The Oprah Winfrey Show_, and serves as adjunct faculty for Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Young worked with the support of the Irvington Historical Society on this project and lives in Indianapolis with her two sons.

Stoner, an Indianapolis-based writer, will sign his book, _Notorious 92: Indiana's Most Heinous Murders in All 92 Counties_, (list price $19.95, paper). Stoner served in Governor Frank O'Bannon's administration as deputy press secretary from 2001 to 2003; in 2006 he published the acclaimed biography _Legacy of a Governor: The Life of Indiana's Frank O'Bannon_. Stoner holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in journalism from both Franklin College of Indiana and Ball State University.

American Airlines Flubs Opportunity to Connect


I. FLIGHT CANCELATIONS CAUSE CUSTOMER PROBLEMS

Since the middle of March, 2008 American Airlines has canceled more than 3,300 flights because of mechanical concerns. The airline called for inspections of each of its planes to inspect “[p]otential wiring hazards in wheel wells that could cause fires or problems with landing gear.” The initial round of inspections was unscheduled and left more than 144,000 passengers without flights.

The in-house inspections appear to have been a reaction to FAA inspections conducted on Southwest Airlines planes. The FAA had been presented with documents indicating that around 100 Southwest aircraft had not been inspected as ordered by FAA regulations. During a congressional hearing occurring at that time, legislators suggested that the FAA had not been enforcing the federal inspection rules. In response, the FAA increased its surveillance, which caused American Airlines to evaluate its own aircraft.

Those stranded by the American Airlines cancelations had little recourse. The airline worked to accommodate its customers by helping them to find other flights, but the passenger load was just too great, and most customers were unable to find alternate transportation. They were left with no other option but to postpone or cancel the plans they had at their destinations. The initial inspections occurred at such short notice that many, if not most, of the passengers affected learned of the cancelations after arriving at the airport.

American Airlines CEO Gerard Appey apologized in prepared statement that was released to the media and posted on the company’s website. Appey’s statement acknowledged that it was the company’s actions, or lack thereof, that led to the unannounced cancelations, and it thanked American Airlines customers “for their patience under very difficult circumstances.” Airports that were affected by the cancelations were saddled with the burden of figuring out what to do with thousands of stranded passengers. Airport restaurants that usually closed in the early evening stayed open around the clock to accommodate American’s customers.

II. THE AIRLINE REACTS -- BARELY

The airline did not handle the situation with grace, and its reputation with its customers suffered. In fact, little was written in the media about the inconveniences caused by the cancelations at all. Appey’s apology was inadequate and not well communicated, and it appears that nothing was done to reimburse the affected customers for their troubles, at least nothing was publicized.

III. WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE

Assuming that the unannounced-nature of the inspections was unavoidable, American Airlines could have done a few things to minimize the fallout. First, it could have provided no-charge transportation for those who needed to return home after learning of the cancelations. It also could have provided food and lodging vouchers, in addition to free transportation, to those stranded from out of town. And rather than having people lug their bags into the airport only to find out at the check-in counter or at the terminal that their flights were canceled, American Airlines employees could have lined the sidewalks to the entrances of the affected airports with networked hand-held devices to advise American customers that their flights had been canceled, thus saving them the inconvenience of attempting to check-in and check their baggage. These employees would also have vouchers in-hand to give and further instructions for the passengers. The scene would have likely still been chaotic, but less so.

After the initial wave of passengers was turned away, the airline should have contacted each one personally with a telephone call to 1) apologize for the situation and 2) offer free or cut-rate future fares. This telephone call would then be followed-up with a letter or email reinforcing and confirming what was said on the telephone call. Then, of course, following through with whatever was offered and accepted would need to be done.

This incident will affect American Airlines’ relationship with its customers in the short term. But the airline did a good job of communicating after-the-fact that it was responding to overbearing government regulation, and most customers will forgive a company for having to deal with bureaucratic rules -- most Americans have had dealings with rigid rules promulgated by the federal government. Besides, a certain degree of inconvenience is expected with air travel, and many customers will shrug this incident off as unfortunate but necessary. American Airlines, and all other airlines for that matter, would be well-advised to have a disaster plan in place to address these types of incidents, because there are sure to be more in the future.

IV. THE PROBLEMS ARE STILL BEING FELT

The fallout from the inspections is still being felt by American Airlines. In both April and May 2008 the airline finished last among domestic carriers in on-time arrivals. More than one third of its flights arrived at least 15 minutes late in April, and the airline blames its placement on the flights it had to cancel. Accordingly, American Airlines’ public relations department is sure to be working overtime for the foreseeable future.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

A Quick Analysis of Coca-Cola's Mission Statement

In general, firms have two mission statements. One is an internal guide for employees to understand what the company does, how it is done, and who it is done for. This internal mission statement keeps the employees focused on the realistic goals of the firm. The other mission statement is broadcast externally. An outline for customers, investors, and business partners, the external mission statement lists who the firm is, what it does, how it does what it does, and how it does what it does better than anyone else. This broader statement contains guidance for those outside of the firm who are interested in doing business with the organization, and it contains broader, aspirational goals, for members of the organization.

The broadness of the Coca-Cola Company’s external mission statement is no exception to the general rule. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to state that every living person on the planet is a potential customer, partner, or recipient, directly and indirectly, of a product, opportunity, service, or other benefit that Coca-Cola may offer. The mission statement is divided into three sections: mission, vision, and values. And each of the sections references ideals that the company espouses.
The goals of the company, as defined by the first section of the mission statement, are many:

“To Refresh the World” -- This is a statement that suggests that Coca-Cola produces some sort of food item, which it does, of course.
“To Inspire Moments of Optimism” -- This statement is unclear and does nothing to differentiate Coca-Cola from any other food producer. One of the goals of every firm is to inspire optimism.
“To Create Value and Make a Difference” -- Likewise, this statement, while better defined than the prior statement, simply plays on the reader’s emotions and adds nothing substantive.

The second section of the mission statement, entitled vision, defines the company and the competition much better than the first. And it defines exactly the product that the company makes. This section lists Coca-Cola’s goals to encourage a happy workforce, to be responsible environmentally, to carry refreshing beverages, to be a good business partner, all while completing its responsibilities to its shareholders.

The last section of the mission statement, named “values,” gives the reader an idea of the qualities that Coca-Cola expects of its employees: leadership, passion, integrity, accountability, collaboration, innovation, and quality, all indicate that the company’s expectations of its employees, and likely its business partners, are high.

Overall, Coca-Cola’s mission statement defines its goals, policies, and values and defines the competency of the company. It indicates the company’s scope; the reach of Coca-Cola is world-wide. It does not, however, do a good job of stating why its operation is better than anyone else’s. As a result, it does not define the competitive environment. Most of the ideals that Coca-Cola lists are generic -- every firm wants to do good by its shareholders and its customers. Consequently, the mission statement needs refined if it is to be taken seriously.